FTSD 2005

Understanding Biodiesel: A Complete Guide

There has been a lot of mixed messaging surrounding the rise of biodiesel. While many governing bodies have touted an extensive lists of performance and environmental benefits, many early adopters have experienced unexpected downsides that are seldomly addressed.

In this article, we will cover what biodiesel is, the history, emergence, and benefits of this “new” fuel, and how many consumers can protect themselves from the issues that arise from biodiesel consumption.

What is Biodiesel?

Biodiesel is a biomass-based diesel fuel derived from plant oils and animal fat and is generally known as an environmentally cleaner alternative to petroleum diesel. The procedure to create biodiesel involves a process called transesterification where plant or animal oil, alcohol, and a catalyst are all combined and heated to induce a chemical reaction. The purpose of this reaction is to breakdown triglyceride molecules into long-chain esters and glycerol molecules. The glycerol byproduct is simply collected and sent off for other uses such as making soaps.

The long-chain esters make up the biodiesel and are very similar to the hydrocarbon chains found in petroleum diesel.

Biodiesel will typically be mixed with petroleum diesel to create a bio-blend which is then sold as a greener alternative to No. 2 diesel. The ratio of biodiesel to petroleum diesel can vary depending on the bio-blend. A “B2” blend, for example, will contain 2% biodiesel and 98% petroleum diesel.

The most popular bio-blends are produced with biodiesel to petroleum diesel ratios of 2% (B2), 5% (B5), or 20% (B20). In some instances, pure biodiesel (B100) is also produced and used for various applications.

The History & Emergence of Biodiesel

1890’s: The first diesel engine was invented by Dr. Rudolf Diesel. The engine ran on pure vegetable oil aiding in Dr. Diesel’s vision to provide fuel for remote agriculture applications where petroleum products were not readily available. Unfortunately, Dr. Diesel’s vision for biofuel was not to be fully realized until nearly a century later.

Rudolf Diesel Illustration

1910’s: Shortly after Dr. Diesel’s death, petroleum became widely available and incredibly cheap. This solidified the rise of petroleum diesel in the world economy and heavily influenced the design of future diesel engines. 

1930’s: A Belgium inventor proposed using transesterification to convert vegetable oil into fatty acid methyl esters, better known today as modern biodiesel. This process would help reduce the viscous nature of vegetable oils which was often viewed as a major barrier for its use in more modern diesel engines.

G. Chavanne Illustration

1980’s: Concerns over the environment, energy security, and overproduction of produce brought biodiesel back into the conversation as a petroleum diesel alternative.

1990's–2000's: Works to further perfect biodiesel was carried out in Europe and South Africa, eventually leading to the rise of the biodiesel industry internationally. The United States lagged in its adoption of biodiesel due to the low prices of petroleum diesel. In the aftermath of 9-11, biodiesel quickly became a household name due to rising oil prices and increased awareness of the United States’ lack of energy independence.

Today: Biodiesel consumption has increased substantially due to the environmental benefits, ease of use, and government incentives. Domestic consumption has grown from 10 million gallons in 2001 to nearly 2 billion gallons in 2016.

Since 2016, biodiesel consumption has remained relatively steady with slight decreases due to new tariffs on cheap biodiesel imports.

The Benefits of Biodiesel

Being a more expensive alternative to petroleum, biodiesel adoption is largely due to its numerous advantages and government incentives. The most significant benefits biodiesel holds over petroleum diesel are outlined below:

#1 Renewable Energy Source: One of the more apparent benefits of biodiesel is the fact its sources can be grown. As previously covered, biodiesel is derived from plant oils and sometimes animal fats, both of which can be readily reproduced as needed. In addition to these renewable sources, biodiesel can also be created from used cooking oils, giving purpose to something that would otherwise be regarded as waste.

#2 Carbon-neutrality: The US government considers biodiesel to be carbon-neutral. This means that the process of producing and consuming fuel has a net-zero effect on CO2 emissions. The CO2 absorbed by the crops used to create biodiesel is enough to offset the CO2 produced when burning the fuel.

Biodiesel Carbon Neutrality Graphic

In all, biodiesel has been shown to produce 78% less CO2 emissions than petroleum diesel.

#3 Emission Reduction: In addition to being carbon-neutral, biodiesel has been shown to emit lower levels of harmful pollutants than petroleum diesel. This includes carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons, particulates, and other air toxins responsible for environmental damage and adverse health effects.

The only exception to this rule would be nitrogen oxide emissions which have been shown to be slightly higher when burning biodiesel.

#4 Enhanced Lubricity: Bio-blended diesel has been shown to have superior lubricity over traditional No. 2 diesel fuel. This is a welcomed advantage as current hydrotreating processes have been stripping petroleum diesel of its lubricity compounds in order to make ultra-low sulfur diesel (ULSD). Federal mandates have required a significant reduction of sulfur content in diesel fuel in order to combat harmful sulfur oxide emissions. Biodiesel has been shown to have naturally lower levels of sulfur making it a good option for decreasing overall sulfur levels in addition to maintaining lubricity in bio-blended diesel fuels. Improvements in fuel lubricity decreases wear on engine parts, thus improving the longevity of those moving components.   

#5 Higher Cetane Ratings: Another benefit biodiesel provides for engines is its higher cetane rating. Although there is no benefit to having a higher cetane rating than what the manufacturer recommends, there is reassurance that the fuel burned does not fall below the specified cetane rating which can result in serious harm to the engine.

#6 Environmentally Safer: Aside from being carbon-neutral and emitting lower levels of harmful emissions, biodiesel is generally regarded as environmentally safe. According to the Alternative Fuels Data Center, “Biodiesel is no more toxic than table salt” and if spilled on the ground it would “quickly degrade into natural organic residue”. 

#7 Engine Compatibility: With a fuel that, on many dimensions, is superior to petroleum diesel, one may question its compatibility with modern diesel engines. Fortunately, biodiesel is very much compatible with almost all diesel engines produced after 1993. Equipment produced before 1993 may have featured rubber seals throughout the fuel system which have been found to not be compatible with 100% biodiesel. For these older engines, bio-blends like B20 have been found to work just fine.

Protecting Yourself from the Downsides of Biodiesel

The downsides of biodiesel are hardly enough to offset the numerous benefits outlined above, but they do present real challenges for use in cold climates and long-term storage.

Fuel Gelling: Diesel has long had a reputation for gelling in cold temperatures, where the fuel solidifies into a waxy gel-like substance that is unable to be pumped into the engine. Biodiesel has been found to be much more susceptible to gelling than petroleum diesel. If not addressed, cold weather gelling can render an entire fuel supply or engine unusable.

When comparing diesel’s characteristics in cold temperatures, two variables often used are cloud point and pour point. The cloud point is the temperature at which the waxes in the fuel begin to solidify, creating a cloudy appearance. Pour Point is the point where diesel fuel loses its flow characteristics.

Diesel Fuel Gelling Temperature Comparisons

When comparing petroleum to biodiesel performance in cold weather, one can see how biodiesel will begin solidifying much sooner than traditional No. 2 diesel. This reality has driven many fuel suppliers to switch away from biodiesel in favor of petroleum diesel in the winter months.

To combat cold weather gelling in diesel fuel, anti-gelling agents are usually blended into the fuel to mitigate the problem. These winter blends are normally sold standard at the pump and can be further enhanced with stronger aftermarket additives for extreme temperatures.

Navigating the additive aftermarket, especially for anti-gelling solutions, can be difficult due to deceptive marketing language. Note that any vague statement like “improves” or “helps to” usually indicate the product is a less serious or untested solution. This does not mean these formulas do not work but they do lack the hard claims necessary to ensure your fuel does not gel in certain cold weather conditions. Hard claims will typically include a temperature rating for pour point or, the more stringent variable, cold filter plug point.

Microbial Contamination: Fuel contamination is an issue that has been plaguing diesel since its inception but, just like gelling, biodiesel has been found to be more susceptible to microbial contamination when compared to its petroleum cousin. This is largely due to the biofuel having a higher affinity to water, the known catalyst for rapid microbial growth in diesel fuel.

Once the water falls out of solution and forms a layer below the diesel fuel, the bacteria and fungi in the fuel will reside in the water and begin to feed off of the fuel itself. In time, these microbes will begin over proliferating, forming a sludge largely composed of dead microbes and their digestive byproducts. This sludge can be detrimental to any fuel system as it begins to clog onboard filters and damage engine components.

Diesel Fuel Contamination Timeline Illustration

This is mostly an issue for the long-term storage of both regular and biodiesel. To combat this problem, AXI recommends regular filtration of the fuel to remove the water and any other contaminants present in the fuel. This can be achieved through mobile fuel polishing or automated fuel filtration. Mobile fuel polishing will involve an individual or third party manually operating a mobile fuel polisher to filter the fuel. This service is usually performed periodically.

Automated fuel maintenance involves a permanently installed fuel maintenance system which will run off a programmed schedule to regularly filter the fuel. These solutions are preferred over mobile servicing as they consistently ensure the fuel supply is free of contamination.

For more on all thing fuel, head on over to our AXI University page.

Selecting the Right Filtration Solution for Your Fuel Tank

Navigating multiple product lines to find the optimal fuel filtration solution can be a daunting task. In this guide, we will walk you through how our fuel quality experts recommend the best fuel filtration system for each use case and tank size. We will cover the key differences between mobile and stationary filtration solutions, outline when a passive or active fuel filtration system should be used, and when to opt for an enclose or compact stationary solution. 

Mobile vs. Stationary Fuel Filtration Systems

The most obvious difference between our mobile and stationary filtration systems lies in the name. All of our mobile fuel polishing systems are in fact mobile and can be moved from tank to tank as opposed to our stationary systems which are permanently installed and usually manage a single fuel tank.

A key difference that may not be so obvious is the use case for both system categories. Mobile polishing systems are designed to restore highly contaminated fuel through manual servicing. The stationary systems often referred to as fuel maintenance systems, are intended to maintain fuel cleanliness by recirculating fuel from the connected tank for routine filtration.

Note, that although both system types are designed to filter contaminants from the fuel, stationary systems are not nearly as efficient at remediating heavily contaminated fuel as the mobile systems. This is why AXI often recommends users employ a mobile polishing service before connecting a stationary system to a pre-existing tank with potentially high levels of fuel contaminants. This saves the end customer from running through an exorbitant number of expensive fine filters to remove larger contaminants such as sludge.

Another point to emphasize is stationary systems, unlike mobile systems, do not require an operator to function. Users set run schedules for these systems to automatically filter the fuel throughout the week. Beyond initial setup and routine filter changes, the stationary systems are completely independent.

Equipped with this information, our fuel quality experts will usually recommend mobile or stationary filtration systems based on the end-users needs. Most purchasers of a mobile polishing system usually aim to provide fuel polishing services to a portfolio of facilities, requiring them to travel to multiple sites for the remediation of various fuel tanks. These individuals or companies usually hold several maintenance contracts in which they are the primary means of fuel filtration for those clients.

It is not uncommon for these customers to purchase a smaller MTC system to start only to later look at high capacity systems to capture bigger contracts that involve polishing larger tanks. For these large high capacity systems, custom trailers are sometimes built to aid in the transportation from site to site.

Mobile systems are usually recommended based on the volume and port sizes of the tanks the user will be servicing. We have included a table below that breaks this down for you:

MTC System Recommended Tank Volumes Min. Port Size
TK-240 XT < 1,000 Gallons 1/2" Port
MTC-1000 < 2,000 Gallons 1" Port
MTC-3000 < 5,000 Gallons 2" Port
MTC-X < 5,000 Gallons 2" Port
MTC HC-50 > 5,000 Gallons 2" Port
MTC HC-90 > 5,000 Gallons 2" Port
MTC HC-150 > 10,000 Gallons 3" Port
MTC HC-300 > 10,000 Gallons 4" Port

In contrast, purchasers of stationary fuel filtration solutions like an FPS or STS system are usually the facilities themselves or yachts owners who cannot afford a lapse in fuel quality/reliability. Although mobile fuel polishing systems are great at bringing even the worst cases of fuel contamination down to ideal levels, they lack the consistency needed to ensure there are no periods of time where the fuel quality is sub-optimal. We often refer to these periods as zones of liability and they usually occur between scheduled fuel polishing services. The following graph illustrates this key difference between periodic fuel polishing and automated fuel maintenance:

Graphic comparing periodic fuel polishing against automated fuel maintenance as solutions for preventing harmful levels of fuel contamination

Passive vs. Active Fuel Filtration Systems

All stationary systems are either active or passive solutions. Active filtration solutions include a pump to pull fuel from the connected tank while passive solutions rely on an external pump to push the fuel through the system. Both of these solution categories are recommended on a circumstantial basis. 

Active filtration systems are the popular option and may be considered a more complete solution due to them not relying on an external pump to function. Yet, having the pump on the system does present some limitations. To pull the fuel from the tank, each system pump has to create a vacuum which, regardless of the pump size, is limited to a maximum horizontal and vertical lift of 100 ft. and 15 ft. respectively. Meaning, if the bottom of an underground storage tank was more than 15 ft. below the system’s pump head, the system would not be able to effectively pull the fuel from the tank.

In cases like this, an external submersible pump would be installed to instead push the fuel out of the tank, freeing one from the limitations of a vacuum pull. With a submersible pump installed, an active filtration solution would be considered redundant due to adding another pump to the process. In these cases, a passive system would make more sense.

AXI currently offers one standard passive system along with a portfolio of more custom solutions designed for various clients.

STS System Flow Rate Recommended Tank Volumes
STS 6/7000 P-35 30 GPM (113.6 LPM) 15,000 - 45,000 Gallons (56,782 - 170,344 Liters)

Enclosed vs. Compact Fuel Filtration Systems

If it has been determined that an active stationary system is the preferred fuel filtration solution, it must then be decided whether a compact or enclosed system is most appropriate based on the installation.

For yachts, a compact system is almost always preferred due to the limited space available in the engine rooms. This also holds for base/belly tanks that reside below enclosed generators. For these tanks, customers will often opt to have a system installed inside the generator enclosure, limiting the installation space but also negating the need for the system to have an enclosure of its own. Typically, compact fuel maintenance systems are more cost-effective than enclosed systems due to their installation locations not requiring them to have NEMA-rated enclosures.

Selecting amongst the available compact systems is largely determined by tank size followed by other supporting factors such as filtration capabilities, system size, and desired upgrade options. We have included a table below that outlines the recommended system based on tank size:

FPS System Flow Rate Recommended Tank Volumes
FPS Compact 1.3 GPM (5 LPM) < 1,000 Gallons (< 3,785 Liters)
FPS DX-S 1.3 GPM (5 LPM) < 1,000 Gallons (< 3,785 Liters)
FPS FX 2.5 GPM (9.5 LPM) < 2,000 Gallons (7,571 Liters)
FPS SX-F 2.5 GPM (9.5 LPM) < 2,000 Gallons (7,571 Liters)
FPS MX-F 4 GPM (15 LPM) < 6,000 Gallons (22,712 Liters)
FPS LX-F 10 GPM (38 LPM) 6,000 – 15,000 Gallons (22,712 – 56,781 Liters)

Should it be determined the recommended system is too large for the available installation space, we typically will suggest the largest system option compact enough to fit. We have also included a table outlining the dimensions of the systems and their controllers below:

System Name System Dimensions Controller Dimensions
FPS Compact 14” x 10” x 8” (36 x 25 x 20 cm) 6.54” x 6.54” x 4.01” (16.6 x 16.6 x 10.19 cm)
FPS DX-S 15” x 18.5” x 7.5” (38 x 47 x 19 cm) Controller Included on System Backplate
FPS FX 20” x 17” x 7” (51 x 43 x 18 cm) Controller Included on System Backplate
FPS SX-F 23” x 26” x 9” (58 x 69 x 23 cm) SFC-50: 10” x 12” x 8” (25 x 30 x 20 cm)
SFC-55: 13.4” x 16” x 7.4” (34 x 41 x 19 cm)
TSC-7000: 16.0” x 13.4” x 7.4” (40.6 x 34.0 x 18.8 cm)
FPS MX-F 23” x 26” 9” (58 x 69 x 23 cm) SFC-50: 10” x 12” x 8” (25 x 30 x 20 cm)
SFC-55: 13.4” x 16” x 7.4” (34 x 41 x 19 cm)
TSC-7000: 16.0” x 13.4” x 7.4” (40.6 x 34.0 x 18.8 cm)
FPS LX-F 26” x 34” x 12” (66 x 86 x 31 cm) SFC-50: 10” x 12” x 8” (25 x 30 x 20 cm)
SFC-55: 13.4” x 16” x 7.4” (34 x 41 x 19 cm)
TSC-7000: 16.0” x 13.4” x 7.4” (40.6 x 34.0 x 18.8 cm)

When addressing large bulk storage tanks, such as cylindrical tanks, an enclosed STS system is typically recommended. This is usually due to the STS system having higher flow rates than what can be found amongst the compact FPS systems.

In addition to higher flow rate options, all STS systems feature NEMA-rated enclosures to protect their components from the elements. These enclosures allow the STS systems to be installed outdoors, closer to the bulk tanks they are intended to maintain.

Much like the FPS systems, all STS systems are usually recommended based on the volume of the tanks they are servicing. We have included a table outlining the suggested STS system based on tank volumes:

STS System Flow Rate Recommended Tank Volumes
STS 6000 SX-F 2.5 GPM (9.5 LPM) < 3,000 Gallons (< 11,365 Liters)
STS 6/7003 3 GPM (11.4 LPM) < 3,000 Gallons (< 11,365 Liters)
STS 6/7004 4 GPM (15 LPM) < 3,000 - 6,000 Gallons (11,356 – 22,712 Liters)
STS 6/7010 10 GPM (38 LPM) < 6,000 - 15,000 Gallons (22,712 – 56,781 Liters)
STS 6/7020 20 GPM (75.7 LPM) 10,000 – 25,000 Gallons (37,854 – 94,635 Liters)
STS 6/7030 30 GPM (113.6 LPM) 15,000 – 45,000 Gallons (56,782 – 170,344 Liters)
STS 6/7040 40 GPM (151.4 LPM) 20,000 – 60,000 Gallons (75,708 – 227,125 Liters)

When it comes to selecting a compact or enclosed fuel maintenance system, there is a multitude of other factors to consider that are not covered in this guide; the number of filtration stages, filter element types, and system options just to name a few. To gain an even deeper insight into selecting the right system for your fuel tank, feel free to reach out to our fuel quality experts by filling out the contact form here.

Algae-X Reseller's Guide: Providing Fuel Solutions to Marina Customers

Attention full-service marinas: Adding fuel maintenance to your ever-growing list of offerings has never been easier. Algae-X is back with a comprehensive guide on how you can capture more revenue without venturing beyond your dock.

Since the invention of diesel fuel, fuel quality has been an unrelenting headache for many yacht and diesel-craft owners who struggle with the dreaded “diesel-bug” or “algae” that often manifests in their tanks. Frequent filter changes, damaged injectors, and variable engine performance are only some of the symptoms that arise from poor fuel quality. This problem is all the more prevalent for seasonal owners who elect to store their vessels for many months at time.

As their trusted marina, you can offer highly effective technology to prevent/remediate fuel contamination and better ensure optimal performance regardless of how long their vessel may sit.

Existing Algae-X resellers have identified four sources of revenue for their businesses and we are going to break each one down in this complimentary guide.

Revenue Source #1: Fuel Testing

Without a solution in place, it is inevitable your diesel customers will experience fuel contamination in their tank(s). In some cases, these customers will opt to have samples from their fuel tank tested to confirm the severity of the issue.

Historically, fuel testing involved taking samples from the bottom of the tank and sending them off to a lab where they would measure the level of microbial growth and water contents. Unfortunately, these measurements would almost never be accurate due to the time lapse between drawing the samples, shipping them, and waiting for the lab to get around to testing them. This reality created a perfect scenario for many mobile polishing companies to convince customers to service their tanks more frequently by intentionally delaying the testing process, giving the microbes in the sample more time to proliferate.

Algae-X provides a more honest solution to fuel testing that can be administered on the spot. In just 15 minutes with three simple steps, customers can receive information on just how contaminated their fuel tanks are.

Our resellers have been providing these instant fuel tests as both a service and a sales tool towards more permanent solutions in lieu of the reactionary mobile polishing services.

Revenue Source #2: System Sales

System sales may be one of the more obvious streams of revenue for a provider of fuel filtration equipment. Algae-X resellers have access to exclusive pricing to ensure revenue can be made on the initial sale while also keeping prices competitive with other providers.

An Algae-X automated filtration system can range anywhere from $3,000 to $14,000 and resellers can expect to profit 20% of the retail price without any markups of their own.

Determining what system is right for each vessel is largely determined by the tank size(s) and available room for installation. To make it easier, Algae-X has created a table which matches the ideal system with different tank sizes.

System Name Flow Rate Recommended Tank Volumes
FPS Compact 1.3 GPM (5 LPM) < 250 Gallons (< 946 Liters)
FPS DX-S 1.3 GPM (5 LPM) < 250 Gallons (< 946 Liters)
FPS FX 2.5 GPM (9.5 LPM) 500+ Gallons (1,893+ Liters)
FPS SX-F 2.5 GPM (9.5 LPM) 500+ Gallons (1,893+ Liters)
FPS MX-F 4 GPM (15 LPM) 1,200+ Gallons (4,542+ Liters)
FPS LX-F 10 GPM (38 LPM) 1,900+ Gallons (7,192+ Liters)

If you find that there is not sufficient room to install the desired system, it is best to explore a system that can be properly fitted into the engine room. Although not ideal, any fuel filtration system will serve a customer better than none. Below is table outlining each system and their controller’s dimensions. There will need to be enough room to mount both, ideally, near each other.

System Name System Dimensions Controller Dimensions
FPS Compact 14” x 10” x 8” (36 x 25 x 20 cm) 6.54” x 6.54” x 4.01” (16.6 x 16.6 x 10.19 cm)
FPS DX-S 15” x 18.5” x 7.5” (38 x 47 x 19 cm) Controller Included on System Backplate
FPS FX 20” x 17” x 7” (51 x 43 x 18 cm) Controller Included on System Backplate
FPS SX-F 23” x 26” x 9” (58 x 69 x 23 cm) SFC-50: 10” x 12” x 8” (25 x 30 x 20 cm)
SFC-55: 13.4” x 16” x 7.4” (34 x 41 x 19 cm)
TSC-7000: 16.0” x 13.4” x 7.4” (40.6 x 34.0 x 18.8 cm)
FPS MX-F 23” x 26” 9” (58 x 69 x 23 cm) SFC-50: 10” x 12” x 8” (25 x 30 x 20 cm)
SFC-55: 13.4” x 16” x 7.4” (34 x 41 x 19 cm)
TSC-7000: 16.0” x 13.4” x 7.4” (40.6 x 34.0 x 18.8 cm)
FPS LX-F 26” x 34” x 12” (66 x 86 x 31 cm) SFC-50: 10” x 12” x 8” (25 x 30 x 20 cm)
SFC-55: 13.4” x 16” x 7.4” (34 x 41 x 19 cm)
TSC-7000: 16.0” x 13.4” x 7.4” (40.6 x 34.0 x 18.8 cm)

Revenue Source #3: System Installations

System installations are where many Algae-X resellers report making their largest chunks of revenue. Many installations are not always straight forward as many OEM tanks lack accessory ports for aftermarket installs. In these situations, retrofitting a system to existing plumbing can take a good amount of manual labor which many resellers are happy to charge a premium for.  

An ideal system installation will usually occur at the OEM level where manufacturers will establish independent plumbing for the fuel filtration system direct into the tank or fuel manifold. Illustrations of this type of installation can be found below:

Unfortunately, many owners do not have the luxury of specifying filtration solutions at the OEM level as many were never offered the option to do so or may not have been the original purchaser of the vessel. For these customers, systems are usually retrofitted to the existing plumbing like so:

Should a reseller run into a difficult installation, Algae-X provides complimentary reseller support in order to help one achieve the best outcome in the most efficient manner.

Revenue Source #4: Maintenance Contracts & Consumable Sales

Once a system is installed, many resellers will offer maintenance contracts which will primarily consist of routine system inspections and filter changes. All Algae-X systems come standard with smart system alarms to notify the user of needed maintenance. This makes it easy for both resellers and end users to know when to change out certain filters.

Keeping filter elements on-hand can provide a great deal of convenience for customers should they realize they need one. These filters can then be made available as al-la-cart consumables or be reserved exclusively for customers who have a signed maintenance contract.

In addition to making replacement filters available for customers, Algae-X provides a line of highly concentrated robust fuel additives. Without a system installed, our fuel additives are the most cost-effective option for customers to experience performance gains such as increased power output and fuel efficiency while also combating fuel contaminants. To learn more about our available fuel additives click here.

Reseller Support

Algae-X confidently stands behind its product offerings and provides resellers with complimentary troubleshooting support and sales tools for customer education. The intent for Algae-X is to enable its resellers to become the fuel quality experts that many of their customer will rely on for all of their marine fueling needs. If becoming an Algae-X reseller interests you, please feel free to navigate to our Algae-X reseller page for more information and application details.

FUELSTAT® Instant Fuel Test Kit

Liqui-Cult Microbial Test Kit

AXI International